Skip to content

cloud-hypervisor: upgrade to v51.1.56#16668

Open
Redent0r wants to merge 10 commits into3.0-devfrom
kata-ci/dom0/scheduled-upgrade-plus-kata2
Open

cloud-hypervisor: upgrade to v51.1.56#16668
Redent0r wants to merge 10 commits into3.0-devfrom
kata-ci/dom0/scheduled-upgrade-plus-kata2

Conversation

@Redent0r
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Redent0r Redent0r commented Apr 14, 2026

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
Upgrade cloud-hypervisor to v51.1.56. This requires a corresponding upgrade to kata-containers and kata-containers-preview

Change Log
  • cloud-hypervisor
  • kata-containers
  • kata-containers-preview
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Test Methodology

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Packaging 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 labels Apr 14, 2026
@Redent0r Redent0r changed the title Kata ci/dom0/scheduled upgrade plus kata2 cloud-hypervisor: upgrade to v51.1.56 Apr 14, 2026
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED label Apr 14, 2026
@Redent0r Redent0r force-pushed the kata-ci/dom0/scheduled-upgrade-plus-kata2 branch from 14127e7 to 2b57379 Compare April 14, 2026 17:05
@Redent0r Redent0r force-pushed the kata-ci/dom0/scheduled-upgrade-plus-kata2 branch from d5eb2a8 to c660781 Compare April 14, 2026 19:06
@Redent0r Redent0r marked this pull request as ready for review April 14, 2026 20:25
@Redent0r Redent0r requested review from a team as code owners April 14, 2026 20:25
@Redent0r
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

todo: upload sources to mariner cache

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@romoh romoh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sprt sprt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just one nit about the version scheme.


Name: kata-containers-preview
Version: 3.27.0~preview1
Version: 3.27.0~preview2
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: IMO we should use the same version format as kata-containers since there's no reason to use a tilde (pre-release) for this package but not for the other one. The preview semantic is already captured in the package name.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you saying to use 3.27.0.preview2 instead ? if so, I agree. It would also align with the GH tag https://github.com/microsoft/kata-containers/releases/tag/3.27.0.preview2 (GH doesn't support ~ in the tag) If @romoh agrees, I can follow up with a PR that switches to 3.27.0.preview2 (We'll have to be careful to make sure that 3.27.0~preview2 does not supersedes 3.27.0.preview2 )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 Packaging specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants